Music As Social Policy?

“There is little doubt that scientific research plays an important role in enhancing our quality of life and improving our future wellbeing. However, today the term ‘the research shows…’ is often deployed because we find it difficult to justify music or art or indeed anything cultural as true or good in its own terms. Yes, cultural entrepreneurs will sometimes rhetorically affirm that music is important in its own right – but increasingly such declarations come across as ritualistic.”

Re-Engineering Your Ear For Better Bass

“An ear’s size is irrelevant; what matters are the properties of a shape that’s intrigued humanity for millennia, inspiring ancient Greek mathematicians and Renaissance painters and anyone who’s ever contemplated a nautilus shell or the center of a sunflower. As scientists better understand the cochlea, might they be able to tweak it? Could they someday make the bass on Junior Wilson’s ‘Dock of the Bay’ remix carry my brain out of my head and across the Pacific, just like it wants to?”

Too Much Of A Good Thing

What if the problem with classical music isn’t that it’s elitist or stuffy, but that we’re so inundated with it that we can’t hope to truly appreciate or understand it fully? “It’s not just music — it’s cultural effusions in general… There is an overabundance of art around, and it can’t be properly digested.”

What’s Neuroscience Got To Do With Art?

“The literary critic as neuroscience groupie is part of a growing trend. We have become accustomed over the past half-century to critics sending out to other disciplines for “theoretical frameworks” in which to place their engagement with works of literature. The results have often been dire, the work or author in question disappearing in a sea of half-comprehended or uncritically incorporated linguistics, mathematics, psychiatry, political theory, history, or whatever. Why do critics do this?”