DAYS OF RECKONING

No one disputes Peter Eisenman’s talents as an architect. But “Eisenman has defined his position in theoretical, abstract and academic terms that defy comprehension by a general audience. The audience, in turn, has responded by wondering why it should care.” Six new designs should tip the balance of his reputation. – New York Times

FLASHING MAD

English museums increasingly allow visitors to take pictures, maintaining that camera flashes don’t damage artwork. Is this true? Not exactly – at minimum it ruins the possibility of a contemplative moment. And the cumulative physical effects of ultraviolet light are uncertain. – The Telegraph (UK)

THE GURU OF MINIMALISM

John Pawson is the king of reductive design. “His work, which ranges from the high Zen Cathay Pacific lounge in the Hong Kong airport to the groovy chic of the Wakenabe and Wagamama restaurants in London, is so reduced to the essential, it ventures beyond the old Mies van der Rohe saw ‘less is more’ into a kind of New Age sacred space.” The Globe and Mail (Canada)

ONLINE CLUB

Venerable Sotheby’s got the Dotcom bug last week and went online. But galleries sell elitism, says one gallery director. “It’s a very, very private club intended not to let people in, and if it gets too big, collectors won’t want to be a part of it any more.” A risk of taking the business online? – The Economist

JUST WHEN DID THE MEDIA START HATING ARTISTS?

Was it art’s “difficult characters?” The big-money 80’s art markets? “The biggest part of the problem may be the front-of-the-book/back-of-the-book structure that ghettoizes all arts coverage, whether news or reviews, in the back pages or special sections. But news is news, and the art(s) worlds are huge industries that demand far more sophisticated news coverage than they receive.” – Media Channel