How Are Private Art Collections “National Treasures”?

“Pictures, over the decades, have been earmarked by the government as ‘national treasures’, which are not to be given export licences. My republican gorge rises. How are Van Dycks, owned by the earls of Pembroke, part of anyone’s heritage (unless your name is Herbert, of course)? “We”, the nation, can see the pictures, at Wilton House for £12 a head (or, touchingly noblesse oblige, free on September 7 this year). But that doesn’t make them ours.”

Art Rising In The West(ern)

The Coeur d’Alene auction of western art was first held in 1985. “That year, there were 132 lots and it brought in $200,000. Last year there were 276 lots fetching $27.4 million, a record that many thought could not be matched. Last month Mr. Stremmel raced through 307 lots in under five hours to bring in $35.4 million, or about $28 million, if you strip away a cache of French Impressionist and Latin American masters that were oddly tucked into this year’s sale.”

American Museums Looking For Leaders

“At least two dozen art museums are leaderless, including such plum traditional institutions as the Kimbell Art Museum in Fort Worth, the National Portrait Gallery and the Phillips Collection in Washington, D.C., and the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts in Philadelphia. Among modern-art museums, director chairs are empty in Houston, Chicago and at New York’s Guggenheim.”

S.F.’s Planned Skyscraper: Good Or Bad? Discuss.

“Now this is exquisite timing: Barry Bonds’ 756th home run and the unveiling of rival designs for San Francisco’s tallest tower and a new transit station came just 28 hours apart. Voila! Bay Area residents have something new to debate in what otherwise would be the doggiest days of summer. … Does San Francisco really need a modernistic ‘icon’ as tall as the Empire State Building?”