Lord Byron: He Knew (Despite Himself) What Women Want

Katha Pollitt: “It is easy to see Byron as a cad, a narcissist and, at bottom, a misogynist. But that would be unfair. Byron’s great insight, in an era where women were expected to be placid and insipid (not that they were!), was to see that women were much like men: They wanted sex and went after it eagerly, if secretly. … He understood, too, how limited was women’s scope for action.”

What Do You Get When A Literary Theorist Reads The US Constitution?

You get, for instance, a “focus on the connotations of what Hamilton in 1788, now thinking of ‘politics by analogy to architecture,’ called the ‘erection of a new government.’ This is a pity, but for a literary scholar … the image of ‘erection’ is too tempting to resist.” Or you get the suggestion that the issue of slavery and human rights is “more legible and meaningful when seen in the context of aesthetic disputes over neoclassicism.”

Brüno: Banned In Ukraine!

The Ukrainian culture and tourism ministry “has so far not explained its decision. But it appears to have taken the view that several of the scenes – among them a mock gay parade, and one in which Brüno shows off his p***s – were likely to offend conservative and religious opinion.”